In today’s business world, companies are scrambling to harness the potential of Generative AI. But amidst the excitement, many find themselves unsure of how to maximize the impact of this new technology.
Generative AI has been hyped so much over the past two years that observers see an inevitable course correction ahead — one that should prompt CIOs to rethink their gen AI strategies.
As a CEO, I’ve seen so many allegedly “game-changing’” technologies come and go this century – from AR/VR technology, blockchain, 3D printing, the Metaverse, NFTs, Web3, and the list goes on and on.
Recently, major questions have been asked about pop-up shops claiming to do taxes with artificial intelligence (AI). Some are even saying they can perform studies for complex incentives such as the Research and Development (R&D) credit. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has this to say flatly…
To stay competitive, traditional companies must rethink the definition of a tech employee. The traditional tech industry is losing its allure for potential employees.
The agricultural industry is no stranger to innovation. From advanced machinery to sustainable farming practices, farmers and business owners continually seek ways to improve efficiency and productivity.
Bryant University is proud to announce the launch of a best-in-class Generative AI chatbot, that is already enhancing community engagement. Developed through a strategic partnership with alliantDigital, provider of advanced AI and intelligent automation solutions, the next gen chatbot, named Ask Tupper
Students, faculty, and staff at Bryant University have a new resource for accessing information, receiving guidance, and keeping up with campus events.
In a rapidly evolving tech landscape, businesses are constantly seeking competitive advantages, and generative AI has emerged as a catalyst for innovation, efficiency and market leadership.
The Internal Revenue Service announced in March that its compliance efforts related to the Employee Retention Credit had exceeded $1 billion, with the agency specifying that “more than 12,000 entities filed over 22,000 claims that were improper and resulted in $572 million in assessments.”